I've got a permission question for you. In SQL Server 2000, if a user
is given a read-only role (which is select to all the tables in a db)
AND another role that allows updates to those same tables, what rights
will prevail?
Toni
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***Rights are addtive, so additional "allow" rulwes which ensure that the user
will have a greater access to the data, except the deny roles which prevent
him regardless in how many roles he is in to allow him doing something.
HTH, Jens Suessmeyer.
"Toni" wrote:
> I've got a permission question for you. In SQL Server 2000, if a user
> is given a read-only role (which is select to all the tables in a db)
> AND another role that allows updates to those same tables, what rights
> will prevail?
> Toni
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
>|||Toni
Both, unless you give them DENY permission.
"Toni" <teibner@.SQLallina.com> wrote in message
news:OQNBKc5hFHA.1248@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I've got a permission question for you. In SQL Server 2000, if a user
> is given a read-only role (which is select to all the tables in a db)
> AND another role that allows updates to those same tables, what rights
> will prevail?
> Toni
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***|||Thank you for the quick response. I don't have any denies so that tells
me what I need to know.
Thanks!
Toni
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
Showing posts with label useris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label useris. Show all posts
Friday, March 23, 2012
Permissions Question
I've got a permission question for you. In SQL Server 2000, if a user
is given a read-only role (which is select to all the tables in a db)
AND another role that allows updates to those same tables, what rights
will prevail?
Toni
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
Rights are addtive, so additional "allow" rulwes which ensure that the user
will have a greater access to the data, except the deny roles which prevent
him regardless in how many roles he is in to allow him doing something.
HTH, Jens Suessmeyer.
"Toni" wrote:
> I've got a permission question for you. In SQL Server 2000, if a user
> is given a read-only role (which is select to all the tables in a db)
> AND another role that allows updates to those same tables, what rights
> will prevail?
> Toni
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
>
|||Toni
Both, unless you give them DENY permission.
"Toni" <teibner@.SQLallina.com> wrote in message
news:OQNBKc5hFHA.1248@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I've got a permission question for you. In SQL Server 2000, if a user
> is given a read-only role (which is select to all the tables in a db)
> AND another role that allows updates to those same tables, what rights
> will prevail?
> Toni
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
|||Thank you for the quick response. I don't have any denies so that tells
me what I need to know.
Thanks!
Toni
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
is given a read-only role (which is select to all the tables in a db)
AND another role that allows updates to those same tables, what rights
will prevail?
Toni
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
Rights are addtive, so additional "allow" rulwes which ensure that the user
will have a greater access to the data, except the deny roles which prevent
him regardless in how many roles he is in to allow him doing something.
HTH, Jens Suessmeyer.
"Toni" wrote:
> I've got a permission question for you. In SQL Server 2000, if a user
> is given a read-only role (which is select to all the tables in a db)
> AND another role that allows updates to those same tables, what rights
> will prevail?
> Toni
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
>
|||Toni
Both, unless you give them DENY permission.
"Toni" <teibner@.SQLallina.com> wrote in message
news:OQNBKc5hFHA.1248@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I've got a permission question for you. In SQL Server 2000, if a user
> is given a read-only role (which is select to all the tables in a db)
> AND another role that allows updates to those same tables, what rights
> will prevail?
> Toni
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
|||Thank you for the quick response. I don't have any denies so that tells
me what I need to know.
Thanks!
Toni
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
Labels:
database,
ive,
microsoft,
mysql,
oracle,
permission,
permissions,
read-only,
role,
select,
server,
sql,
tables,
useris
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)